As a journalist, I have rewritten the article in a unique way. Here it is:
The restoration regulation has been a contentious issue in Finland, with its position on the EU’s proposal being a source of debate and uncertainty. Initially, Finland voted against the proposal but later abstained from voting. Now, their position is once again “no.” Member of Parliament Eveliina Heinäluoma is questioning the government’s handling of the regulation, as it seems inconsistent to now tighten Finland’s stance on it.
Finland’s vote against the restoration regulation has sparked discussion in both Finland and the EU. Despite initially voting against the proposal last summer, it narrowly passed the Council of Member States. During tripartite negotiations, flexibilities were added to the regulation to lower costs and give member countries more control over restoration efforts. However, Finland abstained from voting in November, although this does not count as a vote in qualified majority decisions.
Hungary’s changed vote has added complexity to the situation, as the EU presidency is seeking member states to change their minds and vote in favor of the regulation. However, despite this effort by Hungary, Finland remains steadfast in its decision to vote against it. Minister of Environment Kai Mykkänen expressed dissatisfaction with the situation and emphasized the need for consistency in EU decision-making.
Heinäluoma believes that Finland missed an opportunity to promote a green transition by not supporting the amended regulation. She compares it to past directives that ultimately benefited Finnish businesses and the environment, urging the government to prioritize coherence and consistency in their decisions.
In conclusion, Finland’s position on Finland’s restoration regulation has been a source of debate and uncertainty since its initial rejection last summer. The amended version of the regulation was added with flexibilities during tripartite negotiations but still met opposition from some member states including Finland who remains steadfast in its decision to vote against it despite Hungary changing its vote earlier this year.