In several legal cases, there were plaintiffs who were minors seeking coverage for gender-affirming care. These cases focused on whether insurers could discriminate in coverage, allowing for certain treatments for some conditions but not for those with gender dysphoria. The courts ruled that this discrimination was not acceptable and needed to be stopped.
Recently, in Kansas, the Statehouse failed to override the governor’s veto on a ban for gender-affirming care for youth. Advocates are hopeful that legal victories like the ones in these cases will send a message to governors and statehouses that these bans are not supported and can be successfully challenged in court.
It is important to distinguish these cases from the broader issue of bans on gender-affirming care for minors in different states. Although outcomes in the courts have been mixed, these cases are a step in the right direction for transgender rights and healthcare access for minors.