Greenberg and Ganti embarked on a study to investigate the dynamics of river migration rates. They gathered data from existing measurements of river migration rates and added data from approximately 60 additional rivers, resulting in a total of 139 meandering rivers globally. These rivers varied in regions, climates, sizes, and vegetation regimes. Using satellite imagery, the researchers modeled each river channel as a series of line segments to track how these segments shifted over time, allowing them to measure the river’s migration.
The prevailing belief was that vegetation played a significant role in slowing down river migration by stabilizing the outer bank against erosion. However, experimental evidence suggested that sediment load could also be a significant factor. The analysis by Greenberg and Ganti revealed that rivers with high sediment loads relative to their size migrated faster. While vegetation did slow down river migration as previous studies suggested, the effect was more modest than initially thought. Unvegetated rivers migrated four times faster than similar-sized counterparts, rather than the reported 10-fold increase. This indicates that bar push, rather than bank pull, has a stronger influence on meandering rivers.
Ganti noted that in meandering rivers, one process cannot dominate the other. If there is not enough sediment supply, bank pull will outpace bar push, leading to a braided river. Therefore, it is the balance between bar push and bank pull that creates stable meandering rivers. Ultimately, this study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between different factors that influence river migration rates and highlights the importance of considering both sediment load and vegetation when studying these systems